On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:26 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:46:29PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > >
> > For the record, I agree with Jan's suggestion of passing a pointer
> > to the parse tree, and offline gave David a suggestion verbally as
> > to how this could be handled for PL/PerlU.
> >
> > I don't think we should be tied too closely to a string
> > representation, although possibly the first and simplest callback
> > function would simply stringify the quals.
>
> As I understand Jan's plan, the idea is to create a new relkind with
> an exit to user code at leaf nodes in the plan tree. This would
> require an API design for both user C code and for each PL to use, but
> would then allow PostgreSQL's optimizer to work on JOINs, etc.
>
> Jan, have I got that right so far? Do you have something in the way
> of a rough patch, docs, etc. for this?
It sounds like we can make it happen as text for other DBMS and as plan
nodes for PostgreSQL, which is the best solution all round.
Personally not too worried which way we do this - as long as we do it
for 8.4 :-) It's obviously happening in the background, so I'll leave it
alone.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Sup****t
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
|
