Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Hackers > Re: gsoc, text ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 28 Topic 9625 of 11009
Post > Topic >>

Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments

by j.urbanski@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ== Jul 10, 2008 at 11:26 PM

Tom Lane wrote:
> The way I think it ought to work is that the number of lexemes stored in
> the final pg_statistic entry is statistics_target times a constant
> (perhaps 100).  I don't like having it vary depending on tsvector width

I think the existing code puts at most statistics_target elements in a 
pg_statistic tuple. In compute_minimal_stats() num_mcv starts with 
stats->attr->attstattarget and is adjusted only downwards.
My original thought was to keep that property for tsvectors (i.e. store 
at most statistics_target lexemes) and advise people to set it high for 
their tsvector columns (e.g. 100x their default).
Also, the existing code decides which elements are worth storing as most 
common ones by discarding those that are not frequent enough (that's 
where num_mcv can get adjusted downwards). I mimicked that for lexemes 
but maybe it just doesn't make sense?

> But in any case, given a target number of lexemes to ac***ulate,
> I'd suggest pruning with that number as the bucket width (pruning
> distance).   Or perhaps use some multiple of the target number, but
> the number itself seems about right. 

Fine with me, I'm too tired to do the math now, so I'll take your word 
for it :)

Cheers,
Jan

-- 
Jan Urbanski
GPG key ID: E583D7D2

ouden estin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
 




 28 Posts in Topic:
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-07-03 15:25:44 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
heikki@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-04 10:32:32 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-07-04 11:53:56 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
heikki@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-04 22:20:08 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
j.urbanski@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-06 11:43:20 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-07-07 11:58:45 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
j.urbanski@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-07 23:53:48 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
j.urbanski@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-09 00:33:48 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-07-08 18:43:19 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-10 16:27:31 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
j.urbanski@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-10 22:32:26 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-07-10 17:02:36 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
j.urbanski@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-10 23:26:35 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-07-10 18:19:36 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
j.urbanski@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-11 08:18:25 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-07-10 16:37:28 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
oleg@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-07-14 11:47:17 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
rlippan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-14 07:51:36 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
oleg@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-07-14 16:38:30 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
oleg@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-07-11 03:12:48 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
j.urbanski@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-11 08:23:05 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-07-11 02:30:26 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
j.urbanski@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-11 17:31:00 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-07-13 20:54:19 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-13 23:52:43 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-07-14 00:02:39 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-14 01:01:20 
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-07-14 01:06:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 8:42:03 CST 2008.