Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Isn't the vacuum_delay_point() good enough?

> But that's in the outer loop ... I mean here:

You'd need one heckuva lot of lexemes in a tsvector to make that
im****tant.  Do we have CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in any other loops
over tsvector contents?  I kinda doubt it ...

(I have no real objection to adding CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS there,
I'm just questioning the value.)

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers