Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Tom Lane wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Isn't the vacuum_delay_point() good enough?
>
>> But that's in the outer loop ... I mean here:
>
> You'd need one heckuva lot of lexemes in a tsvector to make that

Tom, I like the 'heckuva' word (in russian we have sort of), but would you

please sometimes put in footnote a translation to a regular english for 
education :)

> im****tant.  Do we have CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in any other loops
> over tsvector contents?  I kinda doubt it ...
>
> (I have no real objection to adding CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS there,
> I'm just questioning the value.)
>
> 			regards, tom lane
>

 	Regards,
 		Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers