On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On 20 okt 2008, at 16.51, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> No, it's not just a hack. It's very close to what we'd probably do if
we
>> built the facility right into the language, although it does involve
the
>> overhead of calling the trigger. However, it performs reasonably well -
not
>> surprising since the guts of it is just a memcmp() call.
>>
> In that case, why not put the trigger in core so people can use it
easily?
+1
This is hard to get right and a common source of errors.
merlin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
|
