Talk About Network

Google





Data Bases > Pgsql Hackers > Re: minimal upd...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 33 Topic 9324 of 11194
Post > Topic >>

Re: minimal update

by tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) Oct 29, 2008 at 11:24 PM

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> I think I like this best of all the suggestions - 
> suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() is what I have now.

> If there's no further discussion, I'll go ahead and commit this in a day

> or two.

The do***entation seems a bit lacking: it gives neither a hint of why
you might want to use this nor why it's not the built-in behavior.
Suggest expending a sentence or two pointing out that the trigger takes
nonzero execution time to do its comparisons, and that this may or may
not be repaid by eliminated updates, depending on whether the client
applications are actually in the habit of issuing useless update
commands.

I think you're missing an <indexentry> item for the function name, also.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
 




 33 Posts in Topic:

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 18:59:26 PST 2009.