Re: Patch to add a socketTimeout property.

On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Toru ****MOGAKI wrote:

> On the other hand, should we  provide the both properties and users
> chose either of them depend on their requirement?
>

My inclination is to apply the keepalive patch now and see where Oliver is

with implementing setQueryTimeout.  Right now keepalives provide 
functionality we can't get and isn't covered by the JDBC API while 
sotimeout is just a brute force global query timeout.  If we're going to 
get real query timeout sup****t soon then we don't need to bother with 
sotimeout.

Oliver are you still planning to work on query timeouts as discussed here?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2008-02/msg00114.php

Kris Jurka

-- 
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc