Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Interfaces Odbc > Re: Working on ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 2292 of 2383
Post > Topic >>

Re: Working on problem, thanks for driver help

by FredP@[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Fred Parkinson") Feb 21, 2008 at 03:25 PM

This is a resend, pardon if it went already; I got no copy so I suspect it
=
never went.

Thanks for your reply.

There is no real code involved in the issue.  My main form, fMain, has a
su=
bform, fStudent.  When the user picks a student from a drop-down list on
fM=
ain, fMain sends the subform fStudent the id of the selected student. 
Upon=
 receiving the student id, the subform makes that student record the
record=
 displayed for editing by using the code 'Me.RecordsetClone.FindFirst
"stud=
ent_id =3D " & cstr(id)' followed by (if no error) 'Me.Bookmark =3D
Me.Reco=
rdsetClone.Bookmark'

This part works as desired.  I have stepped through the problem and found
t=
hat this code is not run when the problem occurs, thus is not causing the
s=
ubform to move unexpectedly to the undesired record.

 If the user then chooses to edit the (tabbed control displayed) student
da=
ta by using the Windows operating system functions ctrl-c, ctrl-v or
ctrl-x=
, the form unexpectedly jumps to a new record before the ctrl-? function
ac=
ts, and the action is then applied to the new, unexpected record!

As for when it started happening, that is unclear, but probably not too
lon=
g ago.  At first the users thought they were making a mistake, that they
we=
re in error somehow, and didn't bring it to my attention until yesterday.

Clearly I need to find out if something was changed in the recent past:
upg=
rade to server, or to workstations (tech sup****t has the habit of making
ch=
anges without telling anyone).  One of the techs thinks that a Win XP
Offic=
e 2002 - Office 2007 compatibility upgrade was done recently on the
worksta=
tions, so I will pursue that as well as whatever else I or others can
think=
 of.

Thank you for considering my problem.

Fred


>>> Andrei Kovalevski <andyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 02/21/2008 1:07 AM >>>
Hello,

It's hard to understand your problem. When did your problem appear?
Show=20
us your ODBC + PostgreSQL relative code.

Fred Parkinson wrote:
> I tried 8.01.02 to replace my old one, but the problem persists.
>
> I will keep trying newer versions, but I thought I might post a
descripti=
on of the problem in the meantime in case someone has seen it or has
sugges=
tions.
>
> In my app. I have a subform which has a tab control with student
informat=
ion, and the form source is table tStudents, a postgres table.
>
> This form is embeded in another form, fMain.
>
> Odd thing is, if I do a Ctrl-V to paste text into a text box on the tab,
=
the form moves to a new record and pastes the data there instead of to the
=
original record that was displayed!  The form has moved to the new record
b=
efore the 'before update' event of the text box has fired.
>
> This happens if I paste into a box on either tab page.  You don't notice
=
it at first because all the rest of the boxes continue to display the data
=
of the original record, until you click on another tab.  Then all the
boxes=
 show the new unwanted record, and there the pasted data is.
>
> Ctrl-X (cut) has the same problem.  Things look good at first, then you
n=
otice that you removed data from a different record that the form has
moved=
 to!
>
> It doesn't happen when I copy all the postgres data into a local access
t=
able and then use it as the record source instead of the postgres table. 
T=
his is what makes me think it may be an odbc driver issue.
>
> Ctrl-V and Ctrl-X are windows functions (I'm on Win XP Professional, not
=
sure which SP) so concievably Win is part of the problem.  I will set up a
=
box with an earlier version of XP and see what happens.
>
> This app has been running smoothly for years, and through several
updates=
 to the backend postgres database.
>
> Thanks in advance for any help, if I solve it I will post a solution.
>
> Fred
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaste
--=20
Andrei Kovalevski
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 sup****t
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/=20




---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help sup****t the PostgreSQL project by donating at

                http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Working on problem, thanks for driver help
FredP@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 15:25:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 20 4:25:49 CDT 2008.