Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Interfaces Pgadmin Hackers > Re: Obsolete "F...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 4320 of 4873
Post > Topic >>

Re: Obsolete "FORCE" option for REINDEX

by tharakan@[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Robins Tharakan") Feb 22, 2008 at 01:08 PM

------=_Part_12129_27741170.1203665928185
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Heaven :)

I think you put to words, what I was trying to guess to be the reason.
I'll
get back.

Thanks
Robins

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Dave Page <dpage@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:56 AM, Robins Tharakan <tharakan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > I too thought this was going to be simple :(  Although this is not the
> final
> > patch, I am mailing this since its getting beyond intriguing to the
zone
> of
> > becoming frustrating. This patch (attached) should have got the job
done
> > yesterday itself... but the FORCE checkbox just doesn't go !!
> >
> > Is there any other file (apart from frmMaintenance.xrc) where its
> position
> > could be set ? I cant understand how does a clean checkout (with this
> patch
> > applied) still get a force checkbox, after compilation ?
> >
> > Any obvious dinosaurs that I am missing here ?
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm just about to leave for FOSDEM so cannot check right now, but my
> guess is that you're running a release build, in which for changes to
> XRC files to become visible you must run ui/embed-xrc which
> regenerates xrcdialogs.cpp from the XRC files.
>
> For testing purposes, a debug build will load the XRC files at
> dialogue invocation time so you can edit them, then just re-open the
> dialogue.
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Oracle-compatible database company
>

------=_Part_12129_27741170.1203665928185
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Heaven :)<br><br>I think you put to words, what I was trying to guess to
be the reason. I&#39;ll get back.<br><br>Thanks<br>Robins<br><br><div
class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Dave Page &lt;<a
href="mailto:dpage@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">dpage@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&gt; wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204,
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div
class="Ih2E3d">On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:56 AM, Robins Tharakan &lt;<a
href="mailto:tharakan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">tharakan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&gt; wrote:<br>

&gt; Hi Dave,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I too thought this was going to be simple :( &nbsp;Although this is
not the final<br>
&gt; patch, I am mailing this since its getting beyond intriguing to the
zone of<br>
&gt; becoming frustrating. This patch (attached) should have got the job
done<br>
&gt; yesterday itself... but the FORCE checkbox just doesn&#39;t go !!<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Is there any other file (apart from frmMaintenance.xrc) where its
position<br>
&gt; could be set ? I cant understand how does a clean checkout (with this
patch<br>
&gt; applied) still get a force checkbox, after compilation ?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Any obvious dinosaurs that I am missing here ?<br>
<br>
</div>Hi,<br>
<br>
I&#39;m just about to leave for FOSDEM so cannot check right now, but
my<br>
guess is that you&#39;re running a release build, in which for changes
to<br>
XRC files to become visible you must run ui/embed-xrc which<br>
regenerates xrcdialogs.cpp from the XRC files.<br>
<br>
For testing purposes, a debug build will load the XRC files at<br>
dialogue invocation time so you can edit them, then just re-open the<br>
dialogue.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
--<br>
Dave Page<br>
EnterpriseDB UK: <a href="http://www.enterprisedb.com"
target="_blank">http://www.enterprisedb.com</a><br>
The Oracle-compatible database company<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_12129_27741170.1203665928185--
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Obsolete "FORCE" option for REINDEX
tharakan@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-22 13:08:48 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 16:33:28 CST 2008.