Dave Page wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Mickael Deloison
> <mdeloison@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > From
> > what I understand I have nothing to do since my code would be under
> > the Artistic License and freely available. Correct?
>
> Yes, in that respect you can comply with the Artistic licence in the
> same way as GPL - use the same (Artistic) licence and release the
> source code.
>
> If you are able to separate your code from the pgAdmin code however,
> it may make sense to dual licence the pgScript engine - have it under
> Artistic for bundling in pgAdmin, and BSD for possible future
> integration with psql.
Yeah, I chatted with Dave about this a couple of days ago, and if you
like this, I think that's the best. Or I think you can license the
whole thing as BSD, that will have no conflict at all with pgadmin -
correct me if I'm wrong here, Dave?
(dual-licensing makes me shudder. Though that's generally the
GPL<->proprietary combination, but the concept has a bad ring to it :-P)
//Magnus
--
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
|
