by nobs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Emil Obermayr)
Mar 27, 2008 at 11:54 AM
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:17:51AM +0000, A B wrote:
> Oh, I just thought of having a boolean field for indicating usage...I
> don't know if it will be more efficient. But as a novice... I think
> that will be sufficient.
Efficiency is alway a point of course. But you have to keep track of
your field and you create a redundant data structure. You might run into
inconsistancy with it.
"My" solution is self-consistant, not redundant and you don't need write
operations during seeking for the fre entry. So maybe its even more
efficient.
--
Sent via pgsql-novice mailing list (pgsql-novice@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-novice
