Hello
2008/7/13 Jeff Davis <pgsql@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
> On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 17:03 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> this is third variant with variadic argumen as scalar. But I still
>> strongly prefer second variant with conformance declared variadic
>> array with used array variable.
>
you checked second or third variant? There are two variants still.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
Please, Tom, can you choose one?
> This version allows you to declare two functions "foo(variadic numeric)"
> and "foo(numeric)", and then if you do a "\df foo" the backend crashes.
>
> Also, you didn't update an error string:
>
> "variadic argument isn't an array" should (in this version) be something
> like: "can't find array type for variadic parameter type %s"
>
> I suggest a slightly different wording for the following error messages:
>
> "aggregate function has variadic argument" -> "variadic parameters not
> sup****ted for aggregate functions"
>
> and
>
> "variadic argument isn't last function's argument" -> "variadic
> parameter must be the last parameter to the function"
>
> Those are just suggested wordings.
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Davis
>
>
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
