On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 07:52 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> you checked second or third variant? There are two variants still.
Sorry for being unclear. Those comments regarded patch v2.2.1. The bug
is in pg_function_is_visible().
Additionally, I'd like to see sup****t for calling variadic functions
with no arguments. I mentioned that in my other email, but it applies to
v2.2.1 as well.
And we should come to a consensus quickly about the declaration style,
e.g. "variadic int[]" or "variadic int".
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
