2008/7/13 Jeff Davis <pgsql@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
> On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 07:52 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> you checked second or third variant? There are two variants still.
>
> Sorry for being unclear. Those comments regarded patch v2.2.1. The bug
> is in pg_function_is_visible().
it's bug, I'll fix it
>
> Additionally, I'd like to see sup****t for calling variadic functions
> with no arguments. I mentioned that in my other email, but it applies to
> v2.2.1 as well.
for some cases, I can do less restriction.
>
> And we should come to a consensus quickly about the declaration style,
> e.g. "variadic int[]" or "variadic int".
ok
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Davis
>
>
thank you very much
Pavel Stehule
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
