Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Performance > shared_buffers ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 14 Topic 3991 of 4156
Post > Topic >>

shared_buffers performance

by mendola@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gaetano Mendola) Apr 14, 2008 at 11:13 AM

Hi all,
I started to do some performance tests (using pgbench) in order to
estimate the DRBD impact on our servers, my plan was to perform some
benchmarks without DRBD in order to compare the same benchmark with
DRBD.
I didn't perform yet the benchmark with DRBD and I'm already facing
something I can not explain (I performed at the moment only reads test).

I'm using postgres 8.2.3 on Red Hat compiled with GCC 3.4.6.

I'm using pgbench with scaling factor with a range [1:500], my server
has 4 cores so I'm trying with 16 client and 4000 transaction per
client: pgbench -t 4000 -c 16 -S db_perf. I did 3 session using 3
different
values of shared_buffers: 64MB, 256MB, 512MB  and my server has 2GB.

The following graph re****ts the results:

http://img84.imageshack.us/my.php?image=totalid7.png

as you can see using 64MB as value for shared_buffers I'm obtaining better
results. Is this something expected or I'm looking in the wrong direction?
I'm going to perform same tests without using the -S option in pgbench but
being a time expensive operation I would like to ear your opinion first.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola





-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
 




 14 Posts in Topic:
shared_buffers performance
mendola@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-14 11:13:05 
Re: shared_buffers performance
stark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-14 11:56:47 
Re: shared_buffers performance
dev@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2008-04-14 12:25:45 
Re: shared_buffers performance
gsmith@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-14 11:44:44 
Re: shared_buffers performance
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-04-14 15:31:54 
Re: shared_buffers performance
stark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-14 20:58:21 
Re: shared_buffers performance
gsmith@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-14 16:08:48 
Re: shared_buffers performance
gsmith@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-14 11:42:50 
Re: shared_buffers performance
Gaetano Mendola <mendo  2008-04-15 11:05:12 
Re: shared_buffers performance
Gaetano Mendola <mendo  2008-04-15 11:11:31 
Vacuum settings
dforums@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-20 19:48:53 
Re: Vacuum settings
alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-21 11:03:37 
Re: shared_buffers performance
mendola@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-15 17:08:02 
Re: Vacuum settings
gc@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gu  2008-04-21 17:31:03 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 21:54:20 CDT 2008.