by adrian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Adrian Moisey)
Apr 14, 2008 at 11:44 AM
Hi
>> the live one is 113G
>> the restored one is 78G
>
> Good news for you is that you know that you can do something ;)
:)
Will this help with performance ?
> Now, is the bloat in the tables (which tables ?) or in the indexes
> (which indexes ?), or in the toast tables perhaps, or in the system
> catalogs or all of the above ? Or perhaps there is a long-forgotten
> process that got zombified while holding a huge temp table ? (not very
> likely, but who knows).
> Use pg_relation_size() and its friends to get an idea of the size of
> stuff.
I'll look into that, thanks
--
Adrian Moisey
Systems Administrator | CareerJunction | Your Future Starts Here.
Web: www.careerjunction.co.za | Email: adrian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+27 21 686 6820 | Mobile: +27 82 858 7830 | Fax: +27 21 686 6842
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
