Jesper Krogh wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I have this "message queue" table.. currently with 8m+ records. Picking
> the top priority messages seem to take quite long.. it is just a matter
> of searching the index.. (just as explain analyze tells me it does).
>
> Can anyone digest further optimizations out of this output? (All records
> have funcid=4)
You mean all records of interest, right, not all records in the table?
What indexes do you have in place? What's the schema? Can you post a "\d
tablename" from psql?
> # explain analyze SELECT job.jobid, job.funcid, job.arg, job.uniqkey,
> job.insert_time, job.run_after, job.grabbed_until, job.priority,
> job.coalesce FROM workqueue.job WHERE (job.funcid = 4) AND
> (job.run_after <= 1208442668) AND (job.grabbed_until <= 1208442668) AND
> (job.coalesce = 'Efam') ORDER BY funcid, priority ASC LIMIT 1
> ;
>
> QUERY PLAN
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Limit (cost=0.00..0.09 rows=1 width=106) (actual time=245.273..245.274
> rows=1 loops=1)
> -> Index Scan using workqueue_job_funcid_priority_idx on job
> (cost=0.00..695291.80 rows=8049405 width=106) (actual
> time=245.268..245.268 rows=1 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (funcid = 4)
> Filter: ((run_after <= 1208442668) AND (grabbed_until <=
> 1208442668) AND ("coalesce" = 'Efam'::text))
> Total runtime: 245.330 ms
> (5 rows)
Without seeing the schema and index definitions ... maybe you'd benefit
from a multiple column index. I'd experiment with an index on
(funcid,priority) first.
--
Craig Ringer
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
|
