Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Performance > Re: Benchmarks ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 3 Topic 4026 of 4424
Post > Topic >>

Re: Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL

by josh@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Josh Berkus) Apr 28, 2008 at 09:07 AM

Greg,

> What I was referring to by "passing" TPC-E was the criteria for a
conformant
> benchmark run. TPC-C has iirc, only two relevant criteria: "95th
percentile
> response time < 5s" and "average response time < 95th percentile
response
> time". You can pass those even if 1 transaction in 20 takes 10-20s which
is
> more than enough to cover checkpoints and other random sources of
inconsistent
> performance.

We can do this now.  I'm unhappy because we're at about 1/4 of Oracle 
performance, but we certainly pass -- even with 8.2.

--Josh

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL
stark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-28 05:17:08 
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL
heikki@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-28 11:59:48 
Re: Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL
josh@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-28 09:07:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 8:17:24 CST 2008.