--Sig_/M1Z3JW2pF/Ojl=o9681LAV8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:40:25 -0400
Gregory Stark <stark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> We certainly can pass TPC-C. I'm curious what you mean by 1/4 though?
> On similar hardware? Or the maximum we can scale to is 1/4 as large
> as Oracle? Can you point me to the actual benchmark runs you're
> referring to?
I would be curious as well considering there has been zero evidence
provided to make such a statement. I am not saying it isn't true, it
wouldn't be surprising to me if Oracle outperformed PostgreSQL in TPC-C
but I would sure like to see in general how wel we do (or don't).
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--=20
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/=20
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
--Sig_/M1Z3JW2pF/Ojl=o9681LAV8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIFjm/ATb/zqfZUUQRAm7hAJoDtOjStcWNrPHk+t21VEjfQEgZKACfZr1U
2izBCGWjJxkkipTK/nUgTd0=
=jqo8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/M1Z3JW2pF/Ojl=o9681LAV8--
