Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:40:25 -0400
> Gregory Stark <stark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> We certainly can pass TPC-C. I'm curious what you mean by 1/4 though?
>> On similar hardware? Or the maximum we can scale to is 1/4 as large
>> as Oracle? Can you point me to the actual benchmark runs you're
>> referring to?
>>
>
> I would be curious as well considering there has been zero evidence
> provided to make such a statement. I am not saying it isn't true, it
> wouldn't be surprising to me if Oracle outperformed PostgreSQL in TPC-C
> but I would sure like to see in general how wel we do (or don't).
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
I am sorry but I am far from catching my emails:
Best thing is to work with TPC-E benchmarks involving the community.
(TPC-C requirements is way too high on storage and everybody seems to be
getting on the TPC-E bandwagon slowly.)
Where can I get the latest DBT5 (TPC-E) kit ? Using the kit should allow
me to recreate setups which can then be made available for various
PostgreSQL Performance engineers to look at it.
Regards,
Jignesh
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
