Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Performance > Re: RAID 10 Ben...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 4050 of 4294
Post > Topic >>

Re: RAID 10 Benchmark with different I/O schedulers (was:

by gsmith@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Smith) May 5, 2008 at 11:59 PM

On Mon, 5 May 2008, Craig James wrote:

> pgbench -i -s 20 -U test

That's way too low to expect you'll see a difference in I/O schedulers. 
A scale of 20 is giving you a 320MB database, you can fit the whole thing 
in RAM and almost all of it on your controller cache.  What's there to 
schedule?  You're just moving between buffers that are generally large 
enough to hold most of what they need.

> pgbench -c 10 -t 50000 -v -U test

This is OK, because when you increase the size you're not going to be 
pu****ng 3500 TPS anymore and this test will take quite a while.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.gregsmith.com
Baltimore, MD

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: RAID 10 Benchmark with different I/O schedulers (was:
gsmith@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-05 23:59:30 
Re: RAID 10 Benchmark with different I/O schedulers
craig_james@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-06 11:30:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Sep 6 15:49:13 CDT 2008.