Re: Possible Redundancy/Performance Solution

On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Dennis Muhlestein
<djmuhlestein@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>  Those are good points.  So you'd go ahead and add the pgpool in front
(or
> another redundancy approach, but then use raid1,5 or perhaps 10 on each
> server?

That's what I'd do.  specificall RAID10 for small to medium drive sets
used for transactional stuff, and RAID6 for very large re****ting
databases that are mostly read.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance