On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Jeffrey Baker <jwbaker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> Service Time Percentile, millis
>>> R/W TPS R-O TPS 50th 80th 90th 95th
>>> RAID 182 673 18 32 42 64
>>> Fusion 971 4792 8 9 10 11
>>
>> Someone asked for bonnie++ output:
>>
>> Block output: 495MB/s, 81% CPU
>> Block input: 676MB/s, 93% CPU
>> Block rewrite: 262MB/s, 59% CPU
>>
>> Pretty respectable. In the same ballpark as an HP MSA70 + P800 with
>> 25 spindles.
>
> You left off the 'seeks' ****tion of the bonnie++ results -- this is
> actually the most im****tant ****tion of the test. Based on your tps
> #s, I'm expecting seeks equiv of about 10 10k drives in configured in
> a raid 10, or around 1000-1500. They didn't publish any prices so
> it's hard to say if this is 'cost competitive'.
I left it out because bonnie++ re****ts it as "+++++" i.e. greater than
or equal to 100000 per second.
-jwb
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
|
