> Glyn Astill wrote:
> > Most likely just a forged header or something, hardly hacked
> > though is it.
>=20
> Yes, hack is the correct term. The bad guys have hacked into the major
e=
mail=20
> systems, including gmail, which was the origin of this spam:
>=20
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/25/gmail_captcha_crack/
>=20
> > I think you need to do some training:
> > http://www2.b3ta.com/bigquiz/hacker-or-spacker/
>=20
> Sending a link to a web site that plays loud rap music is not a friendly
=
way to=20
> make your point.
>=20
> Craig
>=20
Whatever. I see you clicked on the link then, even though it came from a
'h=
acked' mailing list :-)
weren't you the chap that couldn't figure out how to use the slony tools
an=
d threw a wobbler at the developers ...
__________________________________________________________
Not happy with your email address?.
Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available
now=
at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
--=20
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
